Jait Re Jait, the 1977 Jabbar Patel directed, Smita Patil-Mohan Agashe starrer is kind of an oddball film. The soundtrack by Hridaynath Mangeshkar was an instant hit, even before the days when audio cassettes democratised how you listen to music. Even today, every Marathi-speaking ‘literate man’ knows the songs — ‘Mi Raat Takli’, ‘Ami Thaakara, Thaakara...’ and my favourite ‘Tujha Rupacha Bashinde...’
And the film? I have asked a lot of Marathi-speaking people, who watch Marathi films (sometimes out of obligation, for example, at film festivals, sometimes out of love, for example, recent films like ‘Valu,’ ‘Natarang’...) and none have seen the film. Which is a pity actually, because ‘Jait Re Jait’ is an important film, perhaps not in the same league as ‘Umbatha’ or ‘Simhasan’ (or for that matter, ‘Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar’), it nonetheless is a minor gem from Jabbar Patel’s oeuvre. The film is important because it is rooted in the ethics of filmmaking of the time — the leftist movement, the parallel cinema, neo-realism (even though at time all these are obscured by the incessant songs, the ‘anthropologist’s eye’ that Patel masters in the film is unmistakable). Today, you cannot even imagine making a film like this, a film located at the heart of community — the Thakars — and told from the inside point of view. There is no clash of cultures, there is no pressure of ‘civilisation’ as most movies about indigenous communities tend to do. Instead, it’s a loving, tender look at the community and its life, and the rituals. The director seems so much immersed into the lives of the community that at times, the film turns into a documentary, with the camera gawking at the action from a distant, without a comment, without a judgement. This is one of the many triumphs of ‘Jait Re Jait,’ (which literally mean ‘win, win’) and this is why it is one of my favourite Marathi films, despite the fact that I did not like how the film ended, and how the second half of the film dragged at stretches.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcvbbVjBDfGum5iYutZC_QprQJMFvNHz1fkXNqekNSd6bS99RlkNeadB53Op0kQul2Ar_i4-IUROYavTfY43I1P4TKuiO8MQJVHhyIYukwzrEYq7onO0A62RtJW3e0ea2kGgdiZA/s320/Jait.jpg)
Likewise, his forays into cinema was unique, and revolutionary for the time. When other filmmakers were busy doing cinema as entertainment, with comedy and melodrama as presiding deities (Dada Kondke’s name comes to mind, and his place in Marathi cinema is indisputable), Patel took the route of social criticism. He brought the parallel cinema movement of the 1970s to Marathi cinema with political and socially relevant films like Samna (1974), Simhasan (1980), Umbartha (1982) and others.
And his contribution to film movement will need another post to discuss. Suffice to say that he has been successfully running the Pune International Film Festival for nine years now, and it’s not a mean feat.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsk5ayzsTd5iN3Bsbyzmy3NGcItT4twcfE7TQ0nA80FXH9pxYYCqqH39pdXR6RhihtmgWiNg0pjOE5rwzAZbB3ZOC0fWIMvXzYFf50_DW_0XumAL7WW4Qbq0c8ZTANhOBcyuGorQ/s320/Jait2.jpg)
Otherwise, the film is resolutely focused on a small community, the Thakars, who call themselves the birds of the forest (‘ya rana chi pakhar’). It’s mostly a hunting-gathering society, who subsists on selling firewood in the nearby market, which we never see in the film. They also do some farming. They believe in the spirit of the forest, and a deity, a version of Lord Shiva, called Lingoba, whose temple is on the top of the hill. And, music, the drum, the songs and the dances play an important role in their lives. That’s why the film has more songs than the dialogues.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9lZCf5lOfn7Xzdcai3zvma2m9iFrurwNb25VEAv0kIlG8aV2t25oltD7KbHydvne9Ytm2bux9h3WMMwt9aQRLLPnHuw8ac8EANRIMShADQ0SWljHIhw3NB_znZp4xkW2ZZL_DMQ/s320/Jait3.png)
It’s a tragic story of obsession, and a desire to understand what is probably beyond understanding. Chindhi is more practical. Her desire for Nagya has a goal, and after much hardship she achieves it, but for Nagya, his desires are destructive from the very beginning.
The story is told in the form of a traditional play, with two ‘sutradhar’ narrating the story and taking forward the action. Like the ‘sutradhar’ of the classic Sanskrit plays, they also take part in the action, mostly to sing — so we have songs, and songs, and frankly, we are not complaining. If Hridaynath Mangeshkar did nothing else other than the songs of ‘Jait Re Jait,’ he would still be considered one of greatest music composers of India. He is extraordinary.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEin3KJOTRU8F1e38WVkfkt40xPI7AZqD2fzJfuwpyIGP6uxfXdOY0vnqHaWSUoeboK6AKgHDSrWybInswE3IjOxCaWAt-AJxRV1_8w_5mYnqhVtWC6yXdnsHm9zwEoNEOqvilCPyg/s320/Jait4.jpg)
And, finally, the film contains the most erotically-charged song and dance routine I have seen in Indian cinema, especially when the erotic gaze is directed at a man. Nagya, with a red head-gear and a garland of flower beats the drum passionately. The sutradhar sings: Gorya dehat barati kanti / Nagini chi kata / Are zhalo ami taybi....
Such beauty in the fair body, as if the snake’s skin
We all went mad when we saw the sight in the night...
It goes on and on... (‘When your body is made of coral who needs any other jewel’), and Chindhi looks at Nagya, and the camera regards him with as much passion as the lenses can manage. It’s a beautiful piece of art. (If you see the film, look out for the reference to snake imagery, there are abundance of it, and it’s very interesting.)
In an unrelated note, there’s another similarity between Patel and Scorsese: Making documentary on musicians. While Scorsese has done several like ‘No Direction Home: Bob Dylan’ and the Rolling Stones saga ‘Shine a Light’, Patel has directed a documentary on Pandit Shivkumar Sharma.
View: Mi Raat Takli on You Tube
very insightful. would like to discuss more on narrative of the film and semiology, as i am writing a paper on the film.
ReplyDelete